(usda loan mortgage companies, qualifications for a conventional mortgage loan, mortgage home loan process, va mortgage loan credit score requirements, what is the mortgage rate for a va loan, how to apply for a va mortgage loan, mortgage loan omaha, movement mortgage va loan, sierra pacific mortgage my home loan, when to refinance mortgage loan, how much is a jumbo mortgage loan, mortgage loan options for first time home buyers, mortgage loan income to debt ratio, what does it take to be a mortgage loan officer, refinance mortgage and equity loan, qualify for a fha mortgage loan, second mortgage or home equity loan, advantages of a va mortgage loan, va mortgage loan closing costs, apply for mortgage loan online with bad credit, mortgage loan disclosures within 3 days, how to get home mortgage loan, federal home loan mortgage company, prequalify for mortgage loan online, refinance mortgage vs home equity loan, citigroup mortgage loan trust inc phone number, mortgage loan pre approval online, mortgage loan expenses, apply online for mortgage loan, second mortgage loan companies, harp loan second mortgage, fha loan without mortgage insurance, home loan mortgage broker, can i refinance my mortgage and home equity loan together, what is the maximum loan amount for a reverse mortgage, 200k loan mortgage, can i get a home improvement loan with my mortgage, 21st mortgage loan requirements, no mortgage home equity loan, pre approved mortgage but denied loan, bank or mortgage company for home loan, mortgage loan grants, va loan mortgage companies, 100 loan to value mortgage refinance, mortgage loan rate vs apr, veterans mortgage loan, estimate mortgage loan approval amount, who can get a va mortgage loan, is a home equity loan the same as a mortgage, va mortgage loan eligibility, difference between mortgage and home loan, reverse mortgage loan rates, reverse mortgage home loan, reverse mortgage loan scheme sbi, best cheapest car insurance company, who is the best car insurance company for young drivers, best term insurance company, best online car insurance company, best insurance company for drivers with points, best cheap car insurance company, best company for auto insurance, best cheapest auto insurance company, best car insurance company for new drivers, best company for car insurance, cheapest best auto insurance company, which is the best insurance company for auto, what is the best home and auto insurance company, what is the best and cheapest auto insurance company, best and cheapest car insurance company, best company for home and auto insurance, navigators insurance company am best rating, best car insurance company 2015, what is the best insurance company for auto, best car insurance company california, what is the cheapest and best car insurance company, best car insurance company in california, best online insurance company, who is the best rated auto insurance company, best insurance company for auto and home, automotive accident lawyers, accident automotive, automotive insurance company, cheap automotive insurance, automotive insurance, automotive insurance quotes, automotive insurance new york, automotive insurance companies, automotive certification online)

Opinion: Canada is being conscripted in U.S. war on China’s tech sector

François-Philippe Champagne, like the government he is part of, has made a complete U-turn in Canada’s relationship with China. Once a staunch supporter of closer ties with Beijing, the German innovation minister is now speaking of the need to “decouple” from the communist country as it pursues a strategy of economic and military dominance over the West.

“What we want is certainly decoupling, certainly from China and certainly from other regimes in the world that don’t share the same values,” Mr Champagne said at an event in Washington last week, where he is due to meet with the US Secretary Gina Raimondo traveled to trade.

His comments amounted to an outright repudiation of his comments made in 2017, when Mr Champagne, as international trade minister, championed the negotiation of a Canada-China Free Trade Agreement and launched “exploratory talks” on a free trade deal with Beijing.

“Today, there are few places that offer us as many exciting opportunities to expand growth and prosperity through trade and investment as Asia Pacific, and China in particular,” he said at the time. “As one of the largest and fastest growing economies in the world, China is an important part of the global economy and a key partner for Canada.”

By 2020, following China’s imprisonment of Canadians Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig and Beijing’s attempt to block Canadian canola and pork imports (both in retaliation for Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou’s arrest in that country on a US extradition order), Mr Champagne as foreign minister back then to scrap the idea of ​​a Canada-China Free Trade Agreement.

“The China of 2020 is not the China of 2016,” Mr. Champagne offered at the time.

It would be another 18 months before Ottawa officially bans Huawei from participating in that country’s 5G networks after what Mr Champagne called “a full review by our security agencies and in consultation with our closest allies”. But the government refused to take broader action aimed at excluding China from Canada’s high-tech supply chains.

However, the joint reading of Mr Champagne’s meeting at the US Department of Commerce (DOC) suggests Canada is facing increased pressure to join the United States in limiting China’s access to Western technologies that further its economic and military goals could.

According to the readout, Ms. Raimondo “underscored the US commitment to the security of the Canada-US supply chain in the semiconductor industry. … These include efforts to strengthen domestic research and development, commercialize new technologies and innovations in these areas, and strengthen manufacturing capacities in both countries to support the two nations’ shared goals for supply chain resilience and industrial competitiveness. “

Her statement followed the DOC’s move this month to impose unprecedented export controls on US semiconductor chips and chip-making equipment. The measures aim to prevent China from receiving advanced computer chips and applications that incorporate US technology, regardless of where they are invented or manufactured. The move will have far-reaching implications for US allies, including Canada, which aspires to become a global leader in artificial intelligence.

China “has put resources into developing supercomputing capabilities and aims to become the world leader in artificial intelligence by 2030. It uses these capabilities to monitor, track and monitor its own citizens and advance its military modernization,” Deputy Trade Minister Thea D said Rozman Kendler in announcing the export controls. “Our actions will protect U.S. national security and foreign policy interests while sending a clear message that U.S. technological leadership is about both values ​​and innovation.”

Jonathan Berkshire Miller, director of the Indo-Pacific program at the Macdonald Laurier Institute, said he sees the DOC’s move to choke off China’s access to US semiconductor technology “only as the beginning of a series of technological decoupling measures.” the United States, which will inevitably affect Canadian technology companies and researchers. “Canada needs to get a lot more crafty about who we work with, expanding our relationships with South Korea, Taiwan and Japan to be more integrated with those countries than China.”

Indeed, Mr. Miller added that US-led efforts to restrict China’s access to semiconductor technology are dovetailed with efforts to reduce China’s dominance in critical minerals supply chains.

Mr Champagne has signaled that Canada will “intensify its scrutiny” of potential foreign investment in developing critical minerals in that country as Ottawa and Washington coordinate policies aimed at improving North American battery manufacturing.

“Let’s be clear, we will not compromise on matters of national security. That’s our top priority,” he said in January. “The national security clearance framework enshrined in the [Investment Canada Act] is an important tool that allows us to protect Canada from these threats.”

Chinese newspaper Global Times ridiculed Mr Champagne’s call for a detachment from China, saying it was “not new” to hear a Canadian official “parroting Washington’s talking points”. It dismissed his comments “as a signal that Canada wants to be cannon fodder for the US strategy to contain China, which is irresponsible for Canada’s struggling economy.”

After that, there can be no going back to 2017 for either Mr. Champagne or Canada.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

| |
Back to top button