(usda loan mortgage companies, qualifications for a conventional mortgage loan, mortgage home loan process, va mortgage loan credit score requirements, what is the mortgage rate for a va loan, how to apply for a va mortgage loan, mortgage loan omaha, movement mortgage va loan, sierra pacific mortgage my home loan, when to refinance mortgage loan, how much is a jumbo mortgage loan, mortgage loan options for first time home buyers, mortgage loan income to debt ratio, what does it take to be a mortgage loan officer, refinance mortgage and equity loan, qualify for a fha mortgage loan, second mortgage or home equity loan, advantages of a va mortgage loan, va mortgage loan closing costs, apply for mortgage loan online with bad credit, mortgage loan disclosures within 3 days, how to get home mortgage loan, federal home loan mortgage company, prequalify for mortgage loan online, refinance mortgage vs home equity loan, citigroup mortgage loan trust inc phone number, mortgage loan pre approval online, mortgage loan expenses, apply online for mortgage loan, second mortgage loan companies, harp loan second mortgage, fha loan without mortgage insurance, home loan mortgage broker, can i refinance my mortgage and home equity loan together, what is the maximum loan amount for a reverse mortgage, 200k loan mortgage, can i get a home improvement loan with my mortgage, 21st mortgage loan requirements, no mortgage home equity loan, pre approved mortgage but denied loan, bank or mortgage company for home loan, mortgage loan grants, va loan mortgage companies, 100 loan to value mortgage refinance, mortgage loan rate vs apr, veterans mortgage loan, estimate mortgage loan approval amount, who can get a va mortgage loan, is a home equity loan the same as a mortgage, va mortgage loan eligibility, difference between mortgage and home loan, reverse mortgage loan rates, reverse mortgage home loan, reverse mortgage loan scheme sbi, best cheapest car insurance company, who is the best car insurance company for young drivers, best term insurance company, best online car insurance company, best insurance company for drivers with points, best cheap car insurance company, best company for auto insurance, best cheapest auto insurance company, best car insurance company for new drivers, best company for car insurance, cheapest best auto insurance company, which is the best insurance company for auto, what is the best home and auto insurance company, what is the best and cheapest auto insurance company, best and cheapest car insurance company, best company for home and auto insurance, navigators insurance company am best rating, best car insurance company 2015, what is the best insurance company for auto, best car insurance company california, what is the cheapest and best car insurance company, best car insurance company in california, best online insurance company, who is the best rated auto insurance company, best insurance company for auto and home, automotive accident lawyers, accident automotive, automotive insurance company, cheap automotive insurance, automotive insurance, automotive insurance quotes, automotive insurance new york, automotive insurance companies, automotive certification online)
Nova Scotia

Dispute over horse racing revenues heads to Halifax court

A dispute among Nova Scotia racecourses over betting revenue will be heard before a judge this week.

Truro Raceway is seeking a stay in a decision by the Atlantic Provinces Harness Racing Commission that would spread some revenue more evenly across the province.

The other two racecourses in the province are Northside Downs and Inverness Raceway, both located in Cape Breton. They successfully argued before the commission in November that revenue from online and telephone betting was being disproportionately distributed to Truro.

Anthony Stymest, Truro Raceway’s president and director, said it would be detrimental to their business if the decision stood.

“We believe the Race Commission made a decision without a study of the impact it will have, the negative impact it will have on Truro Raceway and the negative impact it will have on the industry as a whole,” Stymest said.

betting earnings

Online and phone betting in the province runs through a website called HPIbet.com.

The site allows anyone in Nova Scotia to bet on horse racing anywhere in North America. Portions of revenue are collected based on weather location.

Under the current distribution system, 63 percent goes to Truro Raceway, 22 percent to Northside Downs and 15 percent to Inverness Raceway.

The new ruling allocates revenue based on area codes.

Under the new system, Truro would receive the revenue from all of mainland Nova Scotia except for a few Dartmouth area codes. These would go to the two Cape Breton tracks.

government grant

The Nova Scotia government also subsidizes the harness racing industry with a $1 million fund. In 2022, this funding was split evenly across the three tracks.

In court documents filed in the suspension motion, Truro Raceway said the new system would result in a loss of about $133,000 in revenue per year.

That loss would have far-reaching career implications, Stymest said. He said it would reduce this year’s list of race events from 31 to 14.

“And it’s just snowballs from there,” Stymest said.

He said it would also mean downsizing. He said mainland people who make a living from the industry would be affected.

“An owner can’t pay his racing bills 14 times a year when you have to keep a horse 52 weeks a year,” Stymest said. “So eventually they will take their horses to other jurisdictions to pay the costs.”

Northside operator says the track deserves more

Joel LeBlanc, chairman of Harness Racing Cape Breton, which operates Northside Downs, said the track earns more from betting revenue since nearly a quarter of it is generated in his area

“Of course, having a formula that reflects where the revenue is being generated from should be a big factor here, and that wasn’t the case with the previous agreement,” LeBlanc said.

LeBlanc said the higher revenue would help expand operations and host more events. Even with the reallocated funds, he said, there shouldn’t be an all-or-nothing situation for any track.

“It’s not a groundbreaking amount of dollars that basically either puts one track in huge surplus and puts another track out of business,” LeBlanc said. “A fairer distribution of these funds will allow all three railways to benefit.”

The motion will be heard in a Halifax court on February 2.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

| |
Back to top button